Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Samsung WB50F and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is very comparable but the WB50F (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WB50F was brought out around the same time to the DP2 Quattro which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB50F scores against the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WB50F DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung WB50F

 DP2 Quattro WB50F 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WB50F DP2 Quattro 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2014Same generation
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Samsung WB50F and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WB50F against the DP2 Quattro.

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB50F and DP2 Quattro.

Plainly, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB50F due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB50F
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
37
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
77
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung WB50F Street photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
48
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB50F Travel photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography info
69
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.1)
53
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
47
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
30
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
9
can't shoot video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB50F vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Samsung WB50FSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB50F Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2014-01-07 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-288mm (12.0x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-6.3 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed - 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 207 grams (0.46 lb) 395 grams (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP70A BP-51
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $180 $931