Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB50F was revealed 3 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WB50F scores versus the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB50F & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sigma Quattro
| WB50F | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung WB50F
| Quattro | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 25 months |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sigma Quattro
| WB50F | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F offers external dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the WB50F against the Quattro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and Quattro is 92 and 63 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and Quattro.
Plainly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB50F using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will give you extra detail because of its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged WB50F is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB50F vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Samsung WB50F | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung WB50F | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 207 gr (0.46 lb) | 625 gr (1.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | BP-61 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $180 | $738 |
