Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
![Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB50F/Samsung-WB50F-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha A7R III front Sony Alpha A7R III front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-A7R-III/Sony-A7R-III-front.jpg)
63 Imaging
77 Features
93 Overall
83
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Released October 2017
- Previous Model is Sony A7R II
- Newer Model is Sony A7R IV
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Samsung WB50F and Sony A7R III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A7R III (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The WB50F was brought out 4 years prior to the A7R III which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the WB50F scores versus the A7R III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB50F & Sony Alpha A7R III. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A7R III
WB50F | A7R III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Samsung WB50F
A7R III | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2017 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 46 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+980k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A7R III
WB50F | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB50F enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony A7R III has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB50F and Sony A7R III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB50F vs the A7R III.
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Alpha-A7R-III-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and A7R III is 92 and 63 respectively.
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III top view buttons comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Alpha-A7R-III-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The pic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and A7R III.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB50F due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A7R III will deliver more detail having its extra 26MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged WB50F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III sensor size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Alpha-A7R-III-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB50F-vs-Sony-Alpha-A7R-III-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2017-10-25 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 207g (0.46 pounds) | 657g (1.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70A | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Retail cost | $180 | $2,800 |