Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB50F was introduced 5 years after the A200 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WB50F scores against the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB50F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A200
| WB50F | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | July 2008 | Newer by 67 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Samsung WB50F
| A200 | WB50F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A200
| WB50F | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB50F has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WB50F and the A200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB50F and A200.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WB50F having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Samsung WB50F will offer you greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher WB50F provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 207g (0.46 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $100 |