Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
49
Features
40
Overall
45

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Previous Model is Sony A200
  • Updated by Sony A290
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Overview

The following is a thorough comparison of the Samsung WB50F and Sony A230, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A230 (10MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WB50F was released 4 years after the A230 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go through a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WB50F scores against the A230 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A230

 WB50F A230 
IntroducedJanuary 2014May 2009Newer by 57 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Samsung WB50F

 A230 WB50F 

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A230

 WB50F A230 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung WB50F comes with external dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung WB50F and Sony A230 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WB50F and the A230.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and A230 is 92 and 69 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The pic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and A230.

All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB50F featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung WB50F will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer WB50F is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB50F Portrait photography details
Sony A230 Portrait photography details
36
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
53
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Samsung WB50F Street photography advice
Sony A230 Street photography advice
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (207 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F Sports photography highlights
Sony A230 Sports photography highlights
39
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
bad battery pack (230 per charge)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
Travel photography with Sony A230
69
lighter than average (207g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
45
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery pack (230 per charge)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
Landscape photography with Sony A230
47
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
51
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
no liveview
low resolution sensor (10MP)
bad battery pack (230 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F Vlogging details
Sony A230 Vlogging details
30
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (207 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
9
no video shooting
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony A230
 Samsung WB50FSony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB50F Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2014-01-07 2009-05-18
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Min shutter speed - 30 seconds
Max shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 207 gr (0.46 pounds) 490 gr (1.08 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 230 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP70A NP-FH50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $180 $569