Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Replaced the Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Samsung WB50F versus Sony A290, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the A290 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the WB50F (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WB50F was unveiled 3 years after the A290 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WB50F matches up vs the A290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A290

 WB50F A290 
RevealedJanuary 2014June 2010More modern by 44 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Samsung WB50F

 A290 WB50F 

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A290

 WB50F A290 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Samsung WB50F has got outer measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony A290 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Compare the Samsung WB50F versus Sony A290 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the WB50F versus the A290.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and A290 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB50F and A290.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB50F having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung WB50F will produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WB50F should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB50F Portrait photography highlights
Sony A290 Portrait photography highlights
37
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
65
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB50F
Street photography with Sony A290
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F Sports photography highlights
Sony A290 Sports photography highlights
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
terrible battery pack (290 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB50F Travel photography info
Sony A290 Travel photography info
69
lighter than others (207 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
53
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (290 shots)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB50F Landscape photography info
Sony A290 Landscape photography info
47
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
58
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
does not have liveview
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F Vlogging details
Sony A290 Vlogging details
30
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic support
9
can't record video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony A290
 Samsung WB50FSony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB50F Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2014-01-07 2010-06-09
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Min shutter speed - 30 seconds
Max shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 207 grams (0.46 lb) 549 grams (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 615
Other
Battery life - 290 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FH50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $180 $600