Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Announced October 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A99
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Samsung WB50F versus Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) have totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WB50F was announced 5 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WB50F scores versus the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

				

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A900

 WB50F A900 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014October 2008More recent by 64 months

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung WB50F

 A900 WB50F 
Screen resolution922k460kCrisper screen (+462k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A900

 WB50F A900 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung WB50F offers external dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB50F versus Sony A900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the WB50F against the A900.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and A900 is 92 and 54 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and A900.

As you can tell, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB50F with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A900 will result in more detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer WB50F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB50F
Portrait photography with Sony A900
37
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
71
has manual focus
MP count amazing (25 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
Sony A900 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
Sony A900 as a Sports photography camera
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
70
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count amazing (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
environment sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB50F Travel photography information
Sony A900 Travel photography information
69
lighter than competition (207g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.1)
54
environment sealing
MP count amazing (25 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A900 as a Landscape photography camera
47
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
72
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count amazing (25 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
no liveview feature
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F Vlogging features
Sony A900 Vlogging features
30
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
9
lack of video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony A900
 Samsung WB50FSony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Company Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB50F Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Launched 2014-01-07 2008-10-22
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 25MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 6048 x 4032
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Available lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed - 30 seconds
Max shutter speed - 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 207g (0.46 pounds) 895g (1.97 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 79
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FM500H
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots Single Dual
Cost at release $180 $2,736