Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-3N

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-3N, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is fairly well matched but the WB50F (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The WB50F was revealed 11 months later than the NEX-3N so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WB50F scores vs the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB50F and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.

In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB50F provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Examine the Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the WB50F vs the NEX-3N.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and NEX-3N is 92 and 89 respectively.

More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB50F and NEX-3N.

Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The WB50F contains the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder. The younger WB50F is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.