Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Released January 2014
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Released February 2016
  • Old Model is Sony A6000
  • Successor is Sony A6500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Overview

Following is a complete assessment of the Samsung WB50F versus Sony A6300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The WB50F was announced 3 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WB50F matches up against the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A6300

 WB50F A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Samsung WB50F

 A6300 WB50F 
ReleasedFebruary 2016January 2014More modern by 25 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution922k460kSharper display (+462k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A6300

 WB50F A6300 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F provides external measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB50F versus Sony A6300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the WB50F versus the A6300.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and A6300 is 92 and 83 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB50F and A6300.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB50F using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A6300 will give you greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged WB50F is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB50F Portrait photography information
Sony A6300 Portrait photography information
37
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
80
has manual focus
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB50F
Street photography with Sony A6300
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
79
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather proof
great high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F Sports photography features
Sony A6300 Sports photography features
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
75
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
Travel photography with Sony A6300
69
lighter than competition (207 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
76
weather proof
decent megapixels (24MP)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB50F Landscape photography information
Sony A6300 Landscape photography information
47
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
79
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proof
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F Vlogging highlights
Sony A6300 Vlogging highlights
30
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
35
offers face detection focusing
great video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external mic support
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB50F vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony A6300
 Samsung WB50FSony Alpha a6300
General Information
Company Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB50F Sony Alpha a6300
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2014-01-07 2016-02-03
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Max boosted ISO - 51200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 425
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30s
Maximum shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 11.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options - Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 207 grams (0.46 lb) 404 grams (0.89 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $180 $889