Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Samsung WB50F versus Sony HX99, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the HX99 (18MP) is pretty comparable but the WB50F (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) enjoy different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB50F was revealed 5 years earlier than the HX99 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the WB50F scores against the HX99 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB50F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB50F Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony HX99
| WB50F | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Samsung WB50F
| HX99 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 |  | January 2014 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony HX99
| WB50F | HX99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3.00" | Identical screen measurements |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung WB50F has exterior measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB50F versus Sony HX99 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the WB50F and the HX99.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and HX99 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB50F and HX99.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB50F having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony HX99 will provide extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older WB50F will be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung WB50F vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2018-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 207 grams (0.46 lb) | 242 grams (0.53 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $180 | $469 |