Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93366/9336655b16176ed18056f21b8b4fc3e901259e6e" alt="Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a660/1a660f9eab550d0e5aed4fe24e8b889b2200ecb9" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III front"
89 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Superseded the Sony RX100 II
- Replacement is Sony RX100 IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Here, we are looking at the Samsung WB50F versus Sony RX100 III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the RX100 III (20MP) is very comparable but the WB50F (1/2.3") and RX100 III (1") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WB50F was brought out 4 months prior to the RX100 III so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WB50F scores versus the RX100 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB50F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery and Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony RX100 III
WB50F | RX100 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Samsung WB50F
RX100 III | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony RX100 III
WB50F | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2014 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung WB50F offers physical dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony RX100 III has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") along with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB50F versus Sony RX100 III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WB50F vs the RX100 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df4a3/df4a3e101a29caf0011c72c5797a7c8fdeb5c1bd" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and RX100 III is 92 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c903e/c903e3dc39eee7b002646534175a90ef48e992ec" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III top view buttons comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and RX100 III.
As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WB50F due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony RX100 III will provide greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50886/50886ce208b8dfa5c953d34782985de1a160caaa" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III sensor size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d5d8/0d5d8f4b0a99e073acd179e0378283b4d44f5681" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2014-05-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 207 grams (0.46 lb) | 290 grams (0.64 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 495 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $180 | $748 |