Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and W290 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WB50F was launched 4 years later than the W290 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WB50F matches up against the W290 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB50F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony W290
| WB50F | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 60 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Samsung WB50F
| W290 | WB50F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony W290
| WB50F | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F offers exterior measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony W290 has proportions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the WB50F vs the W290.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and W290 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB50F and W290.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern WB50F should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB50F vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 207g (0.46 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $180 | $230 |
