Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Refreshed by Sony A68
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Samsung WB50F and Sony A65, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A65 (24MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A65 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB50F was revealed 2 years after the A65 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WB50F matches up vs the A65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB50F & Sony SLT-A65. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A65
WB50F | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | November 2011 | Newer by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Samsung WB50F
A65 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A65
WB50F | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung WB50F offers physical dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony A65 has sizing of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB50F and Sony A65 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the WB50F against the A65.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WB50F and A65 is 92 and 64 respectively.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and A65.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB50F using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony A65 will render more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WB50F provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A65 Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony SLT-A65 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) | 622 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70A | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $180 | $700 |