Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93366/9336655b16176ed18056f21b8b4fc3e901259e6e" alt="Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5a22/b5a22692b0ab5776db7830209793272200c825df" alt="Sony SLT-A99 front Sony SLT-A99 front"
57 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Revealed December 2012
- Succeeded the Sony A900
- Successor is Sony A99 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Samsung WB50F and Sony A99, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the WB50F (16MP) and A99 (24MP) and the WB50F (1/2.3") and A99 (Full frame) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WB50F was released 14 months later than the A99 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WB50F scores against the A99 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB50F & Sony SLT-A99. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB50F Gallery & Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony A99
WB50F | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | Fresher by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Samsung WB50F
A99 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony A99
WB50F | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB50F comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony A99 has measurements of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB50F and Sony A99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the WB50F compared to the A99.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90b6e/90b6e1241d0517bcbfeee81f308e69f5334d4c57" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and A99 is 92 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2930/f293025070566c1cdab92ef780b0ac28ef27a2b5" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The visual here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and A99.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WB50F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A99 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent WB50F should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9202d/9202d7c871148f2a17e730c00e38e9fbf7433c2c" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/278db/278dbecc6512d18877f2ed5c289e01985c6e191a" alt="Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung WB50F vs Sony A99 Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony SLT-A99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB50F | Sony SLT-A99 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2012-12-12 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 19 |
Cross type focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) | 812 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 89 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1555 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP70A | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Pricing at release | $180 | $1,998 |