Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced December 2010
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Released October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Overview
Let's look closer at the Samsung WB700 versus Sony A900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the WB700 (14MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WB700 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB700 was announced 2 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the WB700 matches up vs the A900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB700 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB700 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Sony A900
| WB700 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2010 | October 2008 | More recent by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung WB700
| A900 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 922k | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB700 and Sony A900
| WB700 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB700 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB700 versus Sony A900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WB700 against the A900.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB700 and A900 is 98 and 54 respectively.
Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB700 and A900.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB700 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A900 will provide more detail with its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger WB700 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung WB700 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Samsung WB700 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB700 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-12-28 | 2008-10-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | - | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | () | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 895g (1.97 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 880 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | One | Dual |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $2,736 |