Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Samsung WB750 versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are produced by Samsung. The image resolution of the WB750 (13MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB750 was announced 16 months before the WB800F making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the WB750 grades against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB750 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB750 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Samsung WB800F
| WB750 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung WB750
| WB800F | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB750 and Samsung WB800F
| WB750 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung WB750 offers exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB750 versus Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WB750 versus the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WB750 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB750 and WB800F.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to provide you with greater detail with its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The older WB750 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB750 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung WB750 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung WB750 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-09-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4096 x 3072 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash settings | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $339 | $300 |