Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Samsung WB750 and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB750 (13MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WB750 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB750 was launched 3 years after the A200 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the WB750 matches up versus the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB750 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB750 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Sony A200
| WB750 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | July 2008 | Newer by 39 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Samsung WB750
| A200 | WB750 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB750 and Sony A200
| WB750 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung WB750 has exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB750 and Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WB750 versus the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB750 and A200 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB750 and A200.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB750 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung WB750 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher WB750 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB750 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Samsung WB750 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB750 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2011-09-01 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4096 x 3072 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 572g (1.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $339 | $100 |