Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Samsung WB750 versus Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB750 (13MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB750 was introduced 2 years after the T900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the WB750 scores versus the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB750 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB750 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Sony T900
| WB750 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung WB750
| T900 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB750 and Sony T900
| WB750 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB750 comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB750 versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the WB750 compared to the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB750 and T900 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB750 and T900.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB750 to provide greater detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer WB750 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB750 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung WB750 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB750 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-09-01 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4096 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $339 | $300 |