Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe WB800F was revealed 8 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WB800F grades versus the SD10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sigma SD10. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma SD10
| WB800F | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | March 2004 | Fresher by 108 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 130k | Clearer screen (+330k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Samsung WB800F
| SD10 | WB800F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD10
| WB800F | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma SD10 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the WB800F vs the SD10.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and SD10 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and SD10.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB800F having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail because of its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher WB800F should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $198 |