Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Succeeded the Sigma SD10
- Renewed by Sigma SD15
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB800F was unveiled 6 years later than the SD14 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB800F matches up versus the SD14 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB800F & Sigma SD14. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma SD14
WB800F | SD14 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 77 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 150k | Crisper display (+310k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Samsung WB800F
SD14 | WB800F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD14
WB800F | SD14 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F offers external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma SD14 has measurements of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") along with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WB800F against the SD14.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and SD14 is 92 and 59 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The visual below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and SD14.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB800F with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB800F will resolve extra detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern WB800F provides an edge in sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD14 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD14 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2006-09-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 150k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 750 gr (1.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $198 |