Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Introduced November 2002
  • Renewed by Sigma SD10
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD9, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WB800F was introduced 10 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the WB800F scores vs the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma SD9

 WB800F SD9 
IntroducedJanuary 2013November 2002Fresher by 124 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k130kCrisper display (+330k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung WB800F

 SD9 WB800F 

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD9

 WB800F SD9 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F has outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WB800F against the SD9.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and SD9 is 92 and 54 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and SD9.

Plainly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB800F using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung WB800F will render extra detail using its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer WB800F should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Portrait photography camera
44
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
has face detection focusing
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
47
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (3MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
43
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (950g)
maximum ISO low (400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography information
Sigma SD9 Sports photography information
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
36
great max shutter speed (1/6,000s)
good sensor size (APS-C)
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB800F Travel photography highlights
Sigma SD9 Travel photography highlights
69
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
missing Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
29
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (950g)
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Landscape photography camera
50
focusing manually
decently wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
41
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Vlogging camera
Sigma SD9 as a Vlogging camera
35
decently wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic support
9
lack of video recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD9
 Samsung WB800FSigma SD9
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB800F Sigma SD9
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Launched 2013-01-07 2002-11-26
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 3 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 3200 400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 1.8 inch
Display resolution 460k dot 130k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 16 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218 gr (0.48 lbs) 950 gr (2.09 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $300 $3,001