Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD9, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WB800F was introduced 10 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the WB800F scores vs the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma SD9
WB800F | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2002 | Fresher by 124 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper display (+330k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung WB800F
SD9 | WB800F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD9
WB800F | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F has outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WB800F against the SD9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab4ca/ab4cadfb6dedcce4fde42f19ff33bf5d54dd5c00" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and SD9 is 92 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3e0c/a3e0c1c9aa9163cf877f18a4cd17901277acd0f4" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and SD9.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB800F using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung WB800F will render extra detail using its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer WB800F should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89d83/89d8320b11cd52592411451e9bbdd82b7dc9a0a5" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed384/ed384e0042b5f0a78ed7ad57ec58d766a228378b" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $3,001 |