Samsung WB800F vs Sigma Quattro H

Below is a extended overview of the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma Quattro H, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The WB800F was introduced 4 years prior to the Quattro H and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WB800F matches up against the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.

If you're looking to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F features external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma Quattro H in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WB800F vs the Quattro H.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and Quattro H is 92 and 78 respectively.

Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and Quattro H.

As you can see, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB800F using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will offer extra detail using its extra 29 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.