Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
78 Imaging
74 Features
76 Overall
74
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 465g - 127 x 94 x 48mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Newer Model is Sony A7R II
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A7R, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and A7R (36MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and A7R (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB800F was launched 13 months before the A7R which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WB800F scores versus the A7R for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sony Alpha A7R. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony A7R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A7R
WB800F | A7R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A7R over the Samsung WB800F
A7R | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | January 2013 | More modern by 13 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A7R
WB800F | A7R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB800F has got physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony A7R has dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A7R in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the WB800F and the A7R.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and A7R is 92 and 78 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and A7R.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB800F due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A7R will give more detail utilizing its extra 20MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged WB800F is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7R Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha A7R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha A7R |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 36MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7360 x 4912 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lb) | 465 grams (1.03 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 127 x 94 x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 95 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2746 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $1,898 |