Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Released July 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A230
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WB800F was announced 4 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WB800F matches up vs the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A200

 WB800F A200 
ReleasedJanuary 2013July 2008More modern by 55 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Samsung WB800F

 A200 WB800F 

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A200

 WB800F A200 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F enjoys outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Check out the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WB800F versus the A200.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and A200.

Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB800F using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will produce greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WB800F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
Portrait photography with Sony A200
43
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
53
has manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
Sony A200 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (218g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
Sony A200 Sports photography factors
52
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
Sony A200 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
46
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F Landscape photography features
Sony A200 Landscape photography features
49
has manual focus
decently wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
53
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.7 inches)
no liveview
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
no Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging info
Sony A200 Vlogging info
35
decently wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
9
can't shoot video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony A200
 Samsung WB800FSony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB800F Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2013-01-07 2008-07-17
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options - Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218 grams (0.48 pounds) 572 grams (1.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 63
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 521
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $300 $100