Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

The WB800F was announced 4 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WB800F matches up vs the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A200
WB800F | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2008 | More modern by 55 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Samsung WB800F
A200 | WB800F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A200
WB800F | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F enjoys outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WB800F versus the A200.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and A200.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB800F using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will produce greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WB800F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A200 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $100 |