Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-C3
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is relatively similar but the WB800F (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB800F was unveiled 2 years after the NEX-3 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WB800F scores versus the NEX-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony NEX-3
WB800F | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | June 2010 | Newer by 32 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Samsung WB800F
NEX-3 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony NEX-3
WB800F | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB800F comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has dimensions of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the WB800F and the NEX-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and NEX-3 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and NEX-3.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung WB800F will deliver extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger WB800F is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 297g (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $0 |