Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-5N
- Renewed by Sony NEX-5T
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony NEX-5R, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the NEX-5R (16MP) is pretty close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe WB800F was released 5 months later than the NEX-5R and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WB800F scores against the NEX-5R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony NEX-5R
| WB800F | NEX-5R |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Samsung WB800F
| NEX-5R | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony NEX-5R
| WB800F | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F has got physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5R has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Samsung WB800F versus Sony NEX-5R in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WB800F and the NEX-5R.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and NEX-5R is 92 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and NEX-5R.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The WB800F has the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF harder.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 99 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 910 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $750 |