Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b21bb/b21bb9e64609d6ff611ab5287732608d0fbd5fd6" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5T front Sony Alpha NEX-5T front"
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Released August 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-5R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Samsung WB800F and Sony NEX-5T, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the NEX-5T (16MP) is fairly close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and NEX-5T (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WB800F was brought out 7 months earlier than the NEX-5T which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WB800F grades vs the NEX-5T when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F & Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony NEX-5T
WB800F | NEX-5T |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Samsung WB800F
NEX-5T | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 7 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony NEX-5T
WB800F | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F provides exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5T has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB800F and Sony NEX-5T in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the WB800F vs the NEX-5T.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d19a5/d19a52bded332320d1cfb0845a10317df25f5faf" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and NEX-5T is 92 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4edd/f4eddca721894710b81e221056cc9bacf8462229" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and NEX-5T.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The WB800F has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult. The older WB800F will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82afa/82afa904fc37e27d2c79c1a5890150105615bf68" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bf25/9bf250001dc46070f6c4cabdce3e704e1e40ae6c" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $300 | $400 |