Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
66 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 577g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched October 2011
- Refreshed by Sony HX200V
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the HX100V (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB800F was announced 15 months later than the HX100V which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX100V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WB800F scores vs the HX100V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony HX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony HX100V
WB800F | HX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | October 2011 | Fresher by 15 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX100V over the Samsung WB800F
HX100V | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX100V
WB800F | HX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F comes with exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony HX100V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 577 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the WB800F versus the HX100V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and HX100V is 92 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and HX100V.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of photographs but you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent WB800F is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX100V Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2011-10-21 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.70 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 577 gr (1.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $300 | $429 |