Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Previous Model is Sony HX100V
- Newer Model is Sony HX300
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB800F was unveiled 9 months after the HX200V and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WB800F grades against the HX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony HX200V
| WB800F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 9 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung WB800F
| HX200V | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX200V
| WB800F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung WB800F provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX200V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the WB800F against the HX200V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and HX200V.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Sony HX200V to show greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer WB800F provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.40 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 583 gr (1.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $480 |