Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
63 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Photography Glossary Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Samsung WB800F versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB800F was manufactured at a similar time to the HX300 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WB800F scores versus the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony HX300
| WB800F | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Samsung WB800F
| HX300 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX300
| WB800F | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Samsung WB800F offers physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB800F versus Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F against the HX300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and HX300 is 92 and 63 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The visual below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and HX300.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony HX300 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 623g (1.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $339 |
