Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Launched April 2015
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX90V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the HX90V (18MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB800F was released 3 years prior to the HX90V which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the WB800F grades against the HX90V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony HX90V
| WB800F | HX90V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Samsung WB800F
| HX90V | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 27 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX90V
| WB800F | HX90V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB800F has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony HX90V has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB800F and Sony HX90V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F compared to the HX90V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and HX90V is 92 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and HX90V.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony HX90V to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged WB800F is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung WB800F vs Sony HX90V Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2015-04-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $440 |