Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Announced September 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Samsung WB800F and Sony QX100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is very comparable but the WB800F (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WB800F was manufactured 8 months earlier than the QX100 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the WB800F matches up vs the QX100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony QX100
| WB800F | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Samsung WB800F
| QX100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2013 | January 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony QX100
| WB800F | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F has outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony QX100 has specifications of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB800F and Sony QX100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WB800F compared to the QX100.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and QX100 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and QX100.
Clearly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony QX100 will provide extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged WB800F will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung WB800F vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2013-09-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | None |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $268 |