Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
79 Imaging
70 Features
57 Overall
64
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) use totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB800F was introduced at a similar time to the RX1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the WB800F scores vs the RX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX1
| WB800F | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Samsung WB800F
| RX1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX1
| WB800F | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2013 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX1 has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB800F versus Sony RX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WB800F against the RX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX1 is 92 and 79 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and RX1.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB800F with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX1 will produce more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2013-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 482g (1.06 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 93 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $2,798 |