Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
58 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Announced June 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX10
- Newer Model is Sony RX10 III
Photography Glossary Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 II, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is relatively close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX10 II (1") boast different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB800F was released 3 years before the RX10 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WB800F matches up vs the RX10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX10 II
| WB800F | RX10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Samsung WB800F
| RX10 II | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2015 | January 2013 | Newer by 29 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 II
| WB800F | RX10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F features exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 II has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
See the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WB800F and the RX10 II.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and RX10 II is 92 and 58 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The pic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and RX10 II.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 II will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WB800F will be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2015-06-10 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) | 813 grams (1.79 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $998 |