Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front
Portability
52
Imaging
53
Features
82
Overall
64

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Announced September 2017
  • Older Model is Sony RX10 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Overview

In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is pretty similar but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") use different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WB800F was introduced 5 years prior to the RX10 IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WB800F matches up against the RX10 IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX10 IV

 WB800F RX10 IV 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Samsung WB800F

 RX10 IV WB800F 
AnnouncedSeptember 2017January 2013Fresher by 56 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1440k460kSharper screen (+980k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 IV

 WB800F RX10 IV 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F comes with outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WB800F against the RX10 IV.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and RX10 IV is 92 and 52 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and RX10 IV.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB800F having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX10 IV will deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
44
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
71
has manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
Sony RX10 IV Street photography advice
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (218g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
64
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
saves RAW files
includes touch to focus
weather proof
heavier than others in class (1,095g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
Sony RX10 IV Sports photography factors
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
76
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high fps (24.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports tracking focus
weather proof
has phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB800F Travel photography info
Sony RX10 IV Travel photography info
69
lighter than competitors in class (218g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
56
weather proof
has bluetooth
includes touch to focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (1,095g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F Landscape photography advice
Sony RX10 IV Landscape photography advice
50
manual focus
quite wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
62
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
saves RAW files
weather proof
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging factors
Sony RX10 IV Vlogging factors
35
quite wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (218g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of external mic socket
29
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has mic support
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than others in class (1,095g)
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 IV
 Samsung WB800FSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB800F Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-01-07 2017-09-12
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 315
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dots 1,440k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 24.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings - Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/2000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218 gr (0.48 lbs) 1095 gr (2.41 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $300 $1,698