Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Older Model is Sony RX10 III
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is pretty similar but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") use different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WB800F was introduced 5 years prior to the RX10 IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WB800F matches up against the RX10 IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX10 IV
WB800F | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Samsung WB800F
RX10 IV | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 460k | Sharper screen (+980k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX10 IV
WB800F | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F comes with outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WB800F against the RX10 IV.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and RX10 IV is 92 and 52 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and RX10 IV.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB800F having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX10 IV will deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 1095 gr (2.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $1,698 |