Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
49 Features
68 Overall
56
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 240g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Launched August 2012
- Later Model is Sony RX100 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX100 (20MP) is relatively close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX100 (1") enjoy different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB800F was announced 5 months later than the RX100 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WB800F matches up versus the RX100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony RX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX100
| WB800F | RX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 over the Samsung WB800F
| RX100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100
| WB800F | RX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2012 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F provides exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX100 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WB800F and the RX100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX100 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and RX100.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB800F using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX100 will result in greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-08-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 240 gr (0.53 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 390 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $448 |