Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
89 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched May 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100 II
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 IV
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX100 III (20MP) is pretty close but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX100 III (1") boast totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB800F was released 16 months before the RX100 III which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WB800F matches up vs the RX100 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX100 III
WB800F | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Samsung WB800F
RX100 III | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 16 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 III
WB800F | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F offers physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX100 III has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") along with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WB800F compared to the RX100 III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX100 III is 92 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and RX100 III.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB800F because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony RX100 III will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older WB800F will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2014-05-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 290 gr (0.64 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 495 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $748 |