Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 301g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Launched June 2018
- Older Model is Sony RX100 V
- Later Model is Sony RX100 VII
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 VI, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX100 VI (20MP) is fairly similar but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX100 VI (1") have totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB800F was released 6 years before the RX100 VI and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VI being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WB800F scores against the RX100 VI for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony RX100 VI Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX100 VI
WB800F | RX100 VI |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VI over the Samsung WB800F
RX100 VI | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2018 | January 2013 | Fresher by 65 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 VI
WB800F | RX100 VI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB800F offers physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony RX100 VI has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") along with a weight of 301 grams (0.66 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 VI in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the WB800F and the RX100 VI.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and RX100 VI is 92 and 88 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and RX100 VI.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB800F because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX100 VI will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 VI Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2018-06-05 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 301g (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $1,198 |