Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2011
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB800F was brought out 2 years after the TX100V which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WB800F scores vs the TX100V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony TX100V
WB800F | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Samsung WB800F
TX100V | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony TX100V
WB800F | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F enjoys outside measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony TX100V has proportions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the WB800F and the TX100V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and TX100V is 92 and 95 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and TX100V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of photos however you should take the production date of the products into consideration. The newer WB800F is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $380 |