Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Released January 2010
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and TX7 (10MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and TX7 (1/2.4") possess different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB800F was announced 3 years later than the TX7 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WB800F scores versus the TX7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony TX7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony TX7
WB800F | TX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX7 over the Samsung WB800F
TX7 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony TX7
WB800F | TX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F enjoys external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony TX7 has measurements of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the WB800F versus the TX7.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and TX7 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and TX7.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB800F with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WB800F should have an edge in sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX7 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $300 | $300 |