Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Introduced July 2010
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony TX9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and TX9 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB800F was revealed 2 years later than the TX9 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WB800F matches up vs the TX9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony TX9
WB800F | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Samsung WB800F
TX9 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony TX9
WB800F | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F has got exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has proportions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony TX9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F compared to the TX9.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and TX9 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and TX9.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WB800F is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 149g (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $799 |