Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the W330 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB800F was brought out 3 years after the W330 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WB800F matches up versus the W330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony W330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony W330
| WB800F | W330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Samsung WB800F
| W330 | WB800F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony W330
| WB800F | W330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB800F comes with physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony W330 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the WB800F and the W330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and W330 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and W330.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern WB800F is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB800F vs Sony W330 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 128g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $170 |