Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony WX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and WX1 (10MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and WX1 (1/2.4") boast totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WB800F was released 3 years later than the WX1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony WX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WB800F matches up versus the WX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony WX1
| WB800F | WX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 42 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Samsung WB800F
| WX1 | WB800F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony WX1
| WB800F | WX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB800F has got physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony WX1 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB800F versus Sony WX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WB800F versus the WX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and WX1 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and WX1.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB800F because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher WB800F will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB800F vs Sony WX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2009-08-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $149 |
