Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sony SLT-A55 front
Portability
67
Imaging
56
Features
80
Overall
65

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony A55
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Revealed August 2010
  • Replacement is Sony A57
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the A55 (16MP) is relatively similar but the WB800F (1/2.3") and A55 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WB800F was revealed 2 years after the A55 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WB800F matches up against the A55 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A55

 WB800F A55 
RevealedJanuary 2013August 2010More modern by 29 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Samsung WB800F

 A55 WB800F 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution921k460kCrisper screen (+461k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A55

 WB800F A55 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F has outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony A55 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WB800F vs the A55.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and A55 is 92 and 67 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB800F and A55.

As you can see, both cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The WB800F provides the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF harder. The newer WB800F is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
Portrait photography with Sony A55
44
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB800F
Street photography with Sony A55
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (218 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
77
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
Sony A55 as a Sports photography camera
53
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
68
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
bad battery life (380 shots)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
Travel photography with Sony A55
69
lighter than others (218 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
62
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
does not have Time Lapse function
bad battery life (380 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F Landscape photography advice
Sony A55 Landscape photography advice
50
focusing manually
decently wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
67
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
bad battery life (380 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Vlogging camera
Sony A55 as a Vlogging camera
35
decently wide (23mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (218g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing mic jack
78
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB800F vs Sony A55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sony A55
 Samsung WB800FSony SLT-A55
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB800F Sony SLT-A55
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2013-01-07 2010-08-24
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 218 gr (0.48 lb) 500 gr (1.10 lb)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 816
Other
Battery life - 380 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $800