Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the DP1 Merrill (15MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the DP1 Merrill (APS-C) and Quattro H (APS-H) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe DP1 Merrill was introduced 5 years before the Quattro H and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the DP1 Merrill matches up vs the Quattro H with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Sigma Quattro H
DP1 Merrill | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
Quattro H | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 49 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper screen (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sigma Quattro H
DP1 Merrill | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Sigma DP1 Merrill features outside dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the DP1 Merrill vs the Quattro H.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the DP1 Merrill and Quattro H is 82 and 78 respectively.
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the DP1 Merrill and Quattro H.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The DP1 Merrill having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will render greater detail using its extra 30MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older DP1 Merrill will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sigma |
Model | Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE II engine | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4704 x 3136 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 330 grams (0.73 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,250 | $1,134 |