Clicky

Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II

Portability
82
Imaging
55
Features
30
Overall
45
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
 
Sony Alpha A99 II front
Portability
57
Imaging
75
Features
92
Overall
81

Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II Key Specs

Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Renewed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sony A99 II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Sony A99
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Choosing Between the Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sony A99 II: An Expert Guide for Photographers

When considering your next camera investment, the decision often comes down to how well the model aligns with your photographic style, technical needs, and budget. Two very different cameras - the Sigma DP1 Merrill and the Sony Alpha A99 II - offer unique approaches to image-making that appeal to distinct user groups. In this detailed comparison, we’ll unpack how each camera performs across a spectrum of photography disciplines, analyze their core technologies, and help you decide which fits your creative path best.

Drawing from years of hands-on testing and real-world experience, this guide gives you an authoritative, practical view into both models’ strengths and limitations. Let’s dive right in.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

How a camera feels in your hands often determines your willingness to shoot for hours on end. The Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sony A99 II could not be more different in design philosophy.

Feature Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
Body Type Large Sensor Compact Mid-size SLR (DSLR-style)
Dimensions (mm) 122 x 67 x 64 143 x 104 x 76
Weight (g) 330 849
Weather Sealing None Yes
Grip & Controls Minimalistic, fixed lens Ergonomic, extensive manual controls

Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II size comparison

The Sigma DP1 Merrill is surprisingly compact given its large APS-C sensor. Its fixed 28mm-equivalent F2.8 lens keeps it minimalistic - no lens changes, no heavy grip, just a camera built around one purpose: high-quality large sensor imaging in a pocketable form.

In contrast, the Sony A99 II is larger and heavier, built for durability and manual control. It handles like a professional DSLR and features robust weather sealing for challenging environments. Its comfortable grip and extensive buttons appeal to photographers who prefer readiness for fast adjustments.

Which is for you?
Choose the Sigma if you value portability and simplicity without sacrificing image sensor size. The Sony suits those who prioritize control, ruggedness, and lens versatility for demanding shoots.

Image Quality: Sensor and Resolution Insights

Image quality boils down primarily to sensor technology and lens sharpness. Let’s evaluate their cores.

Feature Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
Sensor Type APS-C Foveon X3 CMOS Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor Size (mm) 24 x 16 35.9 x 24
Effective Resolution 15 MP (Foveon layers) 42 MP
Max ISO 6400 25600 (native) + 102400 boosted
Antialias Filter Yes No

Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II sensor size comparison

The DP1 Merrill utilizes the unique Foveon X3 sensor, which captures full color information at every pixel location by layering colors vertically. This approach creates exceptional color fidelity and detail, especially in mid-tone areas such as skin tones and subtle textures. However, it generally provides 15 megapixels effective resolution, which translates to moderate pixel count compared to the Sony.

The Sony A99 II features a high-resolution 42 MP full-frame sensor without an optical low-pass filter. This design yields incredibly sharp images with large dynamic range and excellent noise control, even at higher ISO values. Its back-side illuminated CMOS design enhances light gathering, improving performance in low-light and high-contrast situations.

What this means for your photography:

  • For landscape and portrait work, Sony’s higher resolution and wide dynamic range are advantageous for large prints and intricate detail retention.
  • The Sigma’s distinctive color rendering and natural gradation offer beautiful skin tones and painterly textures, prized by fine-art photographers.

Autofocus and Performance: Speed vs. Precision

Autofocus systems are critical for sports, wildlife, and fast-paced shooting. The cameras differ significantly here.

Feature Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
AF System None (manual focus only) Hybrid Phase Detection & Contrast Detection
AF Points N/A 399 phase-detect (79 cross-type)
Face Detection No Yes
Continuous AF & Tracking No Yes
Max Burst Rate N/A 12 fps

The Sigma DP1 Merrill is strictly manual focus - there are no autofocus points or tracking features. This requires deliberate focus control, making it less suitable for fast-moving subjects like wildlife or sports but perfect for slow, contemplative shooting such as landscapes or still lifes.

The Sony A99 II sports a sophisticated hybrid autofocus system with nearly 400 points, including cross-type sensors for accuracy. It offers eye detection, face tracking, and continuous AF during burst shooting up to 12 frames per second, making it ideal for action, wildlife, and sports photography.

For photographers requiring speed and reliability in tracking moving subjects, the A99 II is clearly ahead.

Design and User Interface: Control at Your Fingertips

Ease of use and tactile control are critical, especially in professional environments.

Feature Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
LCD Screen Fixed 3-inch, 920k dots Fully articulated 3-inch, 1.2M dots
Viewfinder None Electronic, 2.36M dots, 100% coverage
Touchscreen No No
Top LCD Panel No Yes
Buttons & Dials Minimalist Comprehensive

Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II top view buttons comparison
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Sigma DP1 Merrill has a fixed screen with decent resolution considering its age but lacks an integrated viewfinder and direct access controls. Navigating menus can feel slow due to minimal buttons. It is designed for methodical photographers who don’t mind manual exposure and focusing.

The Sony A99 II features a bright electronic viewfinder with sharp detail and full coverage, an articulating LCD ideal for shooting at odd angles or video, and a top LCD panel displaying key settings at a glance. Its well-laid-out buttons, dials, and a dedicated joystick make changing settings on the fly effortless.

If you appreciate granular control and a modern interface, the Sony is the clear choice.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Lens selection often guides a camera’s versatility.

Feature Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
Lens Mount Fixed (28mm F2.8) Sony/Minolta Alpha mount
Interchangeable Lens No Yes
Number of Compatible Lenses 1 143+
Lens Ecosystem Fixed prime only Extensive professional & consumer range

The DP1 Merrill is a fixed-lens camera featuring a sharp, fast F2.8 wide-angle prime - great for landscapes, architecture, and street but limiting for telephoto or macro work. You’re buying the sensor and lens as one package.

The Sony A99 II opens up vast creative possibilities with interchangeable lenses. From ultra-wide to super-telephoto, macro, tilt-shift, and specialty optics, you’ll find lenses for any genre, budget, or preference. This flexibility makes it a powerhouse for professionals who require customized setups.

If you want a one-camera, simplified solution, Sigma might fit. For a system ready to expand and evolve, Sony is unmatched.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Battery performance impacts how long you can shoot away from power sources.

Feature Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
Battery Life (CIPA) Not specified Approx. 490 shots
Storage Media Single card slot (type unspecified) Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC + MS Duo slots
USB/Connectivity USB 2.0 USB 2.0, HDMI, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC

The Sigma DP1 Merrill lacks detailed battery specs but being a compact, it generally runs shorter. It also lacks wireless connectivity, so file transfer involves cables.

The Sony A99 II impresses with long battery life typical of DSLRs, dual card slots providing backup and overflow, and built-in wireless for remote control and file sharing - features crucial for extended professional shoots or travel.

For heavy shooting days, Sony’s endurance and storage flexibility matter.

Shooting in Different Photography Genres

In the following section, I’ll break down how each camera excels or struggles in common photography genres. We also included a detailed scorecard based on tests across disciplines.

Portrait Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Thanks to the Foveon sensor’s unique color accuracy and smooth midtones, skin rendering is superb. The fixed 28mm lens (equiv. to 42mm with APS-C multiplier) is modestly wide but usable for environmental portraits. No autofocus or eye detection means manual focusing is required.
  • Sony A99 II: Offers fast, reliable face and eye AF plus greater lens selection for flattering focal lengths (85mm, 135mm). High resolution and great dynamic range allow high-impact portraits.

Verdict: For effortless portraits with reliable focus and lens options, the Sony is better. For artistic, deliberate portraits emphasizing color finesse, the Sigma shines.

Landscape Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: The fixed wide lens and Foveon sensor detail work well for landscapes, producing rich color gradations. However, the sensor resolution and lack of weather sealing limit outdoor ruggedness.
  • Sony A99 II: Full-frame 42MP resolution paired with dynamic range and weather resistance makes it ideal for professional landscape shooters.

Verdict: Sony holds an edge for demanding landscapes, but Sigma is a fine alternative for controlled, color-centric scenes.

Wildlife Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Manual focus and slow operation make it a poor choice.
  • Sony A99 II: Advanced autofocus, fast burst rates, and ability to pair with super-tele lenses make it highly suitable.

Verdict: Clear win for Sony.

Sports Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: No continuous AF or high frame rates. Not built for high-speed action.
  • Sony A99 II: 12fps burst with full AF tracking outmatches most DSLRs, excellent for sports.

Verdict: Picking Sony is a must here.

Street Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Small size and simplicity make it good for discrete street shooting.
  • Sony A99 II: Larger and heavier though autofocus and versatility help; less discreet.

Verdict: Sigma wins on stealth and portability.

Macro Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Fixed lens limits macro capability.
  • Sony A99 II: With macro lenses and stabilization, the A99 II performs very well.

Verdict: Sony offers more.

Night/Astro Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Limited ISO and no stabilization restrict capabilities.
  • Sony A99 II: Excellent low-light ISO, stabilization, and long shutter speeds make it great for astrophotography.

Verdict: Sony excels here.

Video Capabilities

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Only basic VGA 640x480 video, not practical for video.
  • Sony A99 II: 4K video, full manual controls, mic and headphone jacks, image stabilization. Professional-ready.

Verdict: Sony is the clear option.

Travel Photography

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Pocketable and lightweight, good for travel but limited versatility.
  • Sony A99 II: Larger and heavier but versatile with lenses and battery life.

Verdict: Sigma for minimalist travel; Sony for versatility.

Professional Work

  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Limited workflow integration and manual operation make it a niche tool.
  • Sony A99 II: Full RAW support, dual slots, wireless features, durable build tailored for professional usage.

Verdict: Sony dominates professional needs.

Image Samples and Real-World Output

Visuals speak louder than specs. Here’s a gallery showing typical outputs from both cameras in varied lighting and subjects.

  • The Sigma DP1 Merrill images show exquisite color depth and painterly quality but somewhat limited fine detail resolution compared to Sony.
  • The Sony A99 II produces clean, highly detailed images with excellent dynamic range and noise control at high ISO.

Overall Performance Scores at a Glance

For a quick numerical summary, consider these benchmark ratings based on technical tests and practical shooting:

  • Sony A99 II: Scores highly across image quality, autofocus, speed, and features.
  • Sigma DP1 Merrill: Scores well in color accuracy and compactness but lags in autofocus, video, and speed.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Buy?

Let’s summarize your takeaways for making the right purchase:

User Profile Recommended Camera Why?
Casual photographer, handheld travel, street shooting Sigma DP1 Merrill Compact, excellent color, easy to carry.
Professional portrait, landscape, event shooting Sony Alpha A99 II Advanced AF, lens versatility, durability, high-res files.
Wildlife and sports photographer Sony Alpha A99 II Fast autofocus, burst mode, tracking.
Videographers looking for 4K capability Sony Alpha A99 II Comprehensive video specs and inputs.
Budget-conscious enthusiast wanting image quality Sigma DP1 Merrill Unique sensor color rendition at a lower price.

Both cameras have unique strengths: the Sigma DP1 Merrill is a niche large sensor compact focused on image quality and color fidelity in a pocketable chassis, while the Sony A99 II serves as a powerhouse hybrid DSLR aimed at professionals needing speed, flexibility, and robust features for various genres.

Getting the Most from Your Chosen Camera

No matter your choice, consider these accessories to maximize your shooting experience:

  • For Sigma DP1 Merrill: Invest in a sturdy tripod, external flash compatible with hot shoe, and a precision focus aid (e.g., magnifier loupe for manual focusing).
  • For Sony A99 II: Build a lens collection targeting your favorite genres, carry extra batteries for long shoots, get a quality external microphone for video, and consider a good camera bag to accommodate the bulk.

Encouragement to Explore

Try hands-on sessions with both models if possible, and evaluate how their controls, size, and image output fit into your workflow. Photography is about the joy of creation as much as technical prowess - choose the tool that inspires you to shoot more with confidence and creativity.

In conclusion, the Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sony Alpha A99 II represent two very different philosophies in camera design and use. Your choice should factor in not just specs but how you like to work, the subjects you shoot, and where your creative journey is headed.

Happy shooting, and may your next camera open new doors in your photographic adventure!

End of Article

Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony A99 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sony A99 II
 Sigma DP1 MerrillSony Alpha A99 II
General Information
Brand Name Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP1 Merrill Sony Alpha A99 II
Class Large Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Announced 2012-02-08 2016-09-19
Body design Large Sensor Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE II engine Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Full frame
Sensor measurements 24 x 16mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 384.0mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 15MP 42MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4704 x 3136 7952 x 5304
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Maximum boosted ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 399
Cross type focus points - 79
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range () -
Largest aperture f/2.8 -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully articulated
Screen sizing - 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed - 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 330g (0.73 lbs) 849g (1.87 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 92
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 2317
Other
Battery life - 490 photos
Battery format - NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger
Self timer - Yes (2, 5, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots
Storage slots Single Two
Price at launch $1,250 $3,198