Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Replacement is Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are offered by Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the DP2 Merrill (15MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the DP2 Merrill (APS-C) and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe DP2 Merrill was brought out 5 years prior to the Quattro H which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the DP2 Merrill matches up against the Quattro H in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma DP2 Merrill & Sigma sd Quattro H. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Sigma Quattro H
DP2 Merrill | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Quattro H | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | February 2012 | Newer by 49 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 920k | Clearer display (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sigma Quattro H
DP2 Merrill | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Sigma DP2 Merrill enjoys exterior measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the DP2 Merrill vs the Quattro H.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Merrill and Quattro H is 83 and 78 respectively.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the DP2 Merrill and Quattro H.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The DP2 Merrill due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will provide you with extra detail having its extra 30MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged DP2 Merrill will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Sigma DP2 Merrill | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sigma |
Model type | Sigma DP2 Merrill | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE II engine | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4704 x 3136 | 6200 x 4152 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30s |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640x480 | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $931 | $1,134 |