Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Sigma DP2 Merrill versus Sony HX300, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the DP2 Merrill (15MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the DP2 Merrill (APS-C) and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe DP2 Merrill was revealed 12 months prior to the HX300 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the DP2 Merrill matches up against the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma DP2 Merrill & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are available at Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Sony HX300
| DP2 Merrill | HX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| HX300 | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 12 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony HX300
| DP2 Merrill | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Sigma DP2 Merrill offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Sigma DP2 Merrill versus Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the DP2 Merrill against the HX300.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the DP2 Merrill and HX300 is 83 and 63 respectively.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the DP2 Merrill and HX300.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The DP2 Merrill using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony HX300 will show more detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older DP2 Merrill will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Sigma DP2 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma DP2 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE II engine | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 24 x 16mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 384.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4704 x 3136 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640x480 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) | 623 grams (1.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $931 | $339 |