Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Introduced April 2012
  • Older Model is Sigma SD1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR and they are both created by Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (APS-C).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The DP2 Quattro was introduced 23 months later than the SD1 Merrill making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the DP2 Quattro scores versus the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 DP2 Quattro SD1 Merrill 
IntroducedFebruary 2014April 2012Fresher by 23 months
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 SD1 Merrill DP2 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 DP2 Quattro SD1 Merrill 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro has outside measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

See the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the DP2 Quattro compared to the SD1 Merrill.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Quattro and SD1 Merrill is 70 and 57 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the DP2 Quattro and SD1 Merrill.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sigma DP2 Quattro to resolve extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent DP2 Quattro is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography info
77
has manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
65
manual focus
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography factors
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
57
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography features
48
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
61
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Travel photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
53
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
environment proofing
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
59
has manual focus
screen is a good size (3")
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
63
manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count good (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging highlights
9
no video
9
no video shooting
Photography Glossary

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Sigma Sigma
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sigma SD1 Merrill
Class Large Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2014-02-13 2012-04-10
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TRUE III engine Dual True II
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 5424 x 3616 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8 -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 grams (0.87 lbs) 790 grams (1.74 lbs)
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $931 $2,339