Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Released August 2012
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
  • Refreshed by Sony NEX-3N
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony NEX-F3, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).

Photography Glossary

The DP2 Quattro was released 19 months later than the NEX-F3 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the DP2 Quattro grades vs the NEX-F3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony NEX-F3

 DP2 Quattro NEX-F3 
ReleasedFebruary 2014August 2012More recent by 19 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 NEX-F3 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony NEX-F3

 DP2 Quattro NEX-F3 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution920k920kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro offers outside measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Check out the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the DP2 Quattro and the NEX-F3.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and NEX-F3 is 70 and 86 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the DP2 Quattro and NEX-F3.

As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sigma DP2 Quattro to give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher DP2 Quattro provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-F3
77
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW files
74
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Street photography camera
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
76
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony NEX-F3 Sports photography advice
48
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
53
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery life (470 shots)
max fps very slow (6.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Travel photography camera
53
decent megapixels (20MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
better than average battery life (470 shots)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Landscape photography camera
59
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
70
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (470 shots)
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging advice
Sony NEX-F3 Vlogging advice
9
can't record video
27
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of external mic port
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony NEX-F3
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Category Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2014-02-13 2012-08-16
Body design Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TRUE III engine Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 16000
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8 -
Number of lenses - 121
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 grams (0.87 lbs) 314 grams (0.69 lbs)
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-51 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media - SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $931 $470