Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90dc9/90dc94a541028ea772791a0c7d7016eaa915f96a" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front"
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Released August 2012
- Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-3N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony NEX-F3, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The DP2 Quattro was released 19 months later than the NEX-F3 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the DP2 Quattro grades vs the NEX-F3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma DP2 Quattro & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The complete galleries are provided at Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony NEX-F3
DP2 Quattro | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
NEX-F3 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony NEX-F3
DP2 Quattro | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro offers outside measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check out the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the DP2 Quattro and the NEX-F3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6896/b68961866a4c92c8db9d5b435ccbefdede519b56" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and NEX-F3 is 70 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57622/576222ccf2cfbc9870adfb2134c12981c4806ba2" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison"
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the DP2 Quattro and NEX-F3.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sigma DP2 Quattro to give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher DP2 Quattro provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eedf4/eedf4cb3bdda6944676c0d8b528a387daf715576" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison"
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c91/31c91c261121f2c5e8abba02be797dfcaece2f26" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Sigma DP2 Quattro | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma DP2 Quattro | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-02-13 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TRUE III engine | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 45mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) | 314 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-51 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $931 | $470 |